Green October

October has been another busy month back in the UK. I decided to attend The Green Party Conference and see if politics can be done differently. I enjoyed attending policy making for Food and Farming. This was a learning curve and along with the discussions about the Green Party’s policy group there was an opportunity to listen to a spokesman from the National Farmers Union. The farmers are aware of the challenges they face and not just from Brexit. Some farms are experiencing lack of water while others not far away are in flooded areas and excess rainwater was being pumped into the sea. The NFU have committed to zero carbon by 2040 in their industry and have the means to do so by sequestering carbon with more hedgerows, trees and other methods. They have a plan.

Another interesting speaker on farming was Sue Pritchard, an organic farmer near Hereford and chair of a RSA report on farming today which involved discussions from a wide range of people in different communities.

The conference plenary sessions were well organised but slow in some areas but most of the main changes to policies and new policies were quickly voted on. I felt that evidence based planning was important. All policies are voted on by all Green Party members who attend the two main conferences.

There was discussion on how to address the climate emergency and the need to reduce emissions by earlier dates than 2050. Many young Greens want 2025 but most Green Party planning has looked at how to practically achieve this by 2030. And even with this there are still ‘gaps’ which need to be addressed. At least the Green Party has plans and an understanding of the complexity of this and the need for all levels of government to be leading the way. I think they do try to do politics differently with a lot more democratic involvement of all members and striving for keeping kindness at the heart of debate and differences of opinion.

I was in London, my home town when Extinction Rebellion were protesting and I went to see what was going on. This group has created a major shift in awareness as to the urgency needed to address the climate crisis. In Spring they brought central London to a bemused standstill. David Attenborough , our nonagenarian also was broadcasting about the drastic changes affecting nature because of human activity. This, along with Greta Thunberg and the school climate actions has created a new awareness that these issues must be addressed now.

In a recent poll conducted by clientearth it seems that the environment will be important in how people will vote in a general election. ‘Of those polled (54%) said climate change would affect how they would vote, with the proportion rising to 74% for under-25s. The poll also showed support for fossil fuel divestment, with 60% of people thinking banks and financial institutions should ditch investments in coal, oil and gas.’

Extinction Rebellion want the government to tell the truth about the effects of carbon emissions, declare a climate emergency and create citizens assemblies to find local ways forward to create the actions needed. I went into London on the Tuesday and there were less crowds than the Monday but still a carnival atmosphere with determined intent and roads closed around Westminster. Their methods may at times be criticised but I do wonder who we will finally criticise the most if we just drift on with our ‘same old’ ways of running our lives.


  • A creative ploy by Extinction Rebellion. Each tree has an MPs name on it and you could ring them and invite them down to collect their present!

I decided to look more carefully at reducing my own carbon emissions. There are many websites about this and often are carbon offsetting ones. However, I had got the open university free course on this so will try their calculator and look at this more carefully on another post.
It certainly will not be easy. Although I could claim my woodland which is allowed to be rather wild, green and vibrant could offset our flights home. One tree in its lifetime may capture 40 tonnes of carbon. We have over 200 trees and lots of wild growth too and birdsong.

But offsetting is not enough. We have to reduce to below  2 tonnes of carbon each.
The average European according to one source will emit about 8 to 10 tonnes of carbon a year. Flight frequency, mileage covered by vehicles, the kind of food we eat can increase or decrease our emissions.

As a vegetarian with little dairy this may save me almost 2 tonnes of carbon. A flight home of about 1000 km is about 0.5 tonnes. The train would be 0.09 tonnes of carbon. As I think I have said before the trains are so much more expensive. From 300 to 800 euros while a flight can easily be below 100 euros and the aviation industry benefits from fuel subsidies. Another problem area that we have little control over yet is how to heat our homes in a carbon friendly way.

How can this dramatic increase not cause many problems?

Change must happen but there is still so much silence and inaction. There are some things we can and must do ourselves and there are others that governments must work on and achieve global cooperation on.

The Guardian is committed to reporting the climate crisis and has many informative and well researched articles from all around the world.







Greta Thunberg says ‘ listen to the scientists’. It may be complex but the scientists, the Green Party and now British farmers know we will face too many difficult consequences if we don’t take the right actions now.

And for our natural world the crisis has been happening slowly but significantly with the combination of loss of habitat and climate change creating unpredictable and extreme weather conditions along with wildfires and flooding.

The State of Nature report 2019: loss of nature since 1970 ‘We need a strong new set of environmental laws to hold our governments and others to account and to set long-term and ambitious targets. Only a robust approach to environmental protections and law making can deliver this for England, Wales and Northern Ireland.’ From The National Trust

The Royal Society for Protection of Birds also comments and calls the 2019 report ‘a wake up call’.

Species and habitat protection, forests, wetlands, all will help as are natural ways of capturing carbon and maintaining a balanced ecosystem .

Who we put in charge will matter as there have been many wake up calls, many broken promises and little well informed and coordinated planning and action. And when in charge of our democracies they must be held to account.

24 thoughts on “Green October”

      1. Yes, the streets I walked down that day around parliament were delightfully empty of cars! But it was easy that day on the tubes. But yes, lots of people, protests and the opening of Parliament! Whoops, now closing again.

        Liked by 1 person

  1. Thanks for the info. It sounds like a mutually supportive group, which is a step in the right direction.

    I continue to fear industrial toxins and plastic garbage more than I do CO2, but ya gotta start somewhere. Of course, plastic is a petroleum product, but few people seem to make that connection.

    The water shortage for farmers seems to be a more immediate problem. All vegetation, including farms, are carbon sinks. Why isn’t some hotshot suggesting better rainwater storage sites? It seems criminal to pump it into the ocean. The ocean has enough water.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, I think there is no joined up thinking about the environment among most political leaders. There is plenty of information from scientific research and I think the States had some of the best resourced science until the Trump admin began to dismantle it. Water management is key but because the rain might come the following year it seems to be forgotten about, until….Our farmers seem to know now that changing weather patterns and extremes are affecting crop and livestock production plus soil deterioration. We have a little more water in our well now and more rain to come!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Water will always be an issue, whether too much or too little, polluted or pure. It’s certainly not a class issue and theoretically could be a point everyone could rally around, more tangible than CO2 and methane, which are relatively abstract concepts, I think.

        Not that I’m going to change anyone’s mind on this . . .

        Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh that’s so sad. Our remember hedgehogs in our West London garden when I was a child. We saw some here once but dangerously on the road. It’s hard to know how our local wildlife is doing as it has to hide away.


  2. A great read. Down here on the other side of the world where most of Australia is in drought we are having similar protests and grassroots movements springing up to make things happen. We can’t wait for governments to act. Hugs and love to you xx

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Georgina, a fascinating post and I’ve never read of a party conference before. Sounds more interesting than I would have expected which is good. The climate is rightly being discussed and noticed nowadays, and Greta Thunberg is amazing! A long way to go but at least it has got people’s attention. I’m intrigued by the carbon calculator on the Open University and will check this out. You are right about how energy-wise we still us a lot of carbon but when there are days in the UK where more than 50% of the energy used is from renewable sources – this is incredible! It’s a matter of building on this and not becoming complacent. Finally, good and effective governorship and leadership will make all the difference.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. A very interesting and well researched post, Georgina. Living where I do, with no public transport and no shops nearer than seven miles away I am aware that my carbon footprint is larger than it should be with the amount of driving I have to do. We need a pro-active government that encourages businesses and the general public alike to reduce our carbon emissions and our use of plastics. The Green Party appears to be the one to do it if it could ever get enough seats in parliament.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Clare. It is a tough call and I think living rurally we need some transport. We only have solar for electricity and not enough capacity for an electric car recharge but the price is now all beyond our pension! I think we do individually as much as we can but there must be more government initiatives to move carbon zero into reality.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Excellent overview, thank you. MrB and I were discussing it all last night, and the challenge it seems to us is that the policy makers and others are all looking for ways to still do much of what we currently do but in a ‘greener’ way .. and actually for real change the debate needs to shift to stopping much of what we do and accepting that for the planet to survive we may need to curtail many of the things we take for granted such a travel, cheap food, comfortable lives etc. A thought anyway . . . .

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks, Becky, I think there is a paradox to all the green talk and the reason why there needs to be a debate or these citizens assemblies as we look deeper into this. I could cut my carbon emissions in half by no flights and no car says one carbon offsetting website. There is still 3 or 4 tonnes to go and a lot because of heating and the products we buy. This was looking at an average but was interesting. Train to Andalucia would be 0.09 as compared to flights of 0.5 tonnes. Some of our lifestyles have involved being far from family. We are in Spain now but think the chestnut harvest will be poor due to a long drought. But just seen a hoopoe through the window here. Will be in Portugal from next Wednesday till the 12 th November.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Easy to be ‘head in the sand’ about this, or to think that we’re doing our bit, but it obviously isn’t enough. As ever, vested interests fudge things so that it’s hard to know what’s true. And government? Well… not much cause for optimism there.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No, I don’t think there is any scientific basis for that connection. The virus has been analysed and found to come mainly from bat and a little from pangolin. Pangolin is a rare wild animal that can be found in some of the meat markets in China. Cities and close proximity of people have helped spread it. Today in Spain we begin our 15 days of everyone who can staying at home. The aim is to stop the spread. It may help slow it so health services can cope with the vulnerable who can get serious life threatening symptoms. The one thing coronavirus is ironically doing is helping cut carbon emissions. Perhaps Trump’s only contribution on banning flights from Europe.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.